IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jopcd0/v3y2013i2p59-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Student Perceptions on the Utilization of Formative Feedback in the Online Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Colleen Halupa

    (Department of Graduate and Professional Studies, A. T. Still University, Kirksville, MO, USA)

  • Doris U. Bolliger

    (Department of Professional Studies, College of Education, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA)

Abstract

This article addresses instructors’ formative feedback to graduate student writing. The authors investigated the utilization of a formative feedback option in online master and doctoral degree programs in health education and administration. Two hundred and five graduate students at a small private university in the Midwest in various health programs completed an online questionnaire focusing on student perceptions of the use of formative feedback including preferences, utilization, usefulness, and barriers. The first part of the survey was completed by all respondents; the second part of the questionnaire was directed at formative feedback users only. Over seventy three percent of respondents utilized the feedback option and most individuals valued the feedback. Results highlighted differences of learner perceptions and preferences. Participants offered a number of barriers and reasons for non-use; however, students who did not utilize the option were either satisfied with their performance or were unable to meet deadlines set by instructors.

Suggested Citation

  • Colleen Halupa & Doris U. Bolliger, 2013. "Student Perceptions on the Utilization of Formative Feedback in the Online Environment," International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 3(2), pages 59-76, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jopcd0:v:3:y:2013:i:2:p:59-76
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijopcd.2013040104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jopcd0:v:3:y:2013:i:2:p:59-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.