IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jncr00/v1y2010i3p19-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Zipper and Non-Zipper Merging Patterns Near Merging Point of Roads

Author

Listed:
  • Y. Wakita

    (Nagoya University, Japan)

  • T. Iguchi

    (Nagoya University, Japan)

  • H. Shimizu

    (Nagoya University, Japan)

  • T. Tamaki

    (Okinawa College of Technology, Japan)

  • E. Kita

    (Nagoya University, Japan)

Abstract

At the merging point, vehicles on the main road must reduce their velocity to avoid slow merging vehicles from a branch road, which leads to a traffic jam. Some researchers point out the effectiveness of a zipper merging pattern for improving the traffic near the merging point. In this study, the authors discuss the effectiveness of a zipper merging pattern using cellular automata simulation. Firstly, the single and multiple vehicle following models are defined. The stability analysis of the models then gives the parameters. In the simulation, two merging patterns are compared. In the non-zipper merging pattern, two vehicles merge continuously from a branch road. In the zipper merging pattern, two vehicles merge between main road vehicles. The results show that the zipper merging pattern is more effective than the non-zipper merging pattern for reducing the traffic jam near the merging point.

Suggested Citation

  • Y. Wakita & T. Iguchi & H. Shimizu & T. Tamaki & E. Kita, 2010. "Comparison of Zipper and Non-Zipper Merging Patterns Near Merging Point of Roads," International Journal of Natural Computing Research (IJNCR), IGI Global, vol. 1(3), pages 19-39, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jncr00:v:1:y:2010:i:3:p:19-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jncr.2010070102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jncr00:v:1:y:2010:i:3:p:19-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.