IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jmmme0/v12y2022i1p1-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of Constitutive Models for Predicting the Formability of SS 304 by Tubular Hydroforming Process

Author

Listed:
  • Pathapalli Venkateshwar Reddy

    (Vardhaman College of Engineering, India)

  • B. Veerabhadra Reddy

    (G. Pulla Reddy Engineering College, India)

  • Perumalla Janaki Ramulu

    (Adama Science and Technology University, Ethiopia)

  • U. Pranavi

    (Vardhaman College of Engineering, India)

Abstract

Finite Element (FE) simulation of sheet/tube forming precision depends mainly on the accuracy of the constitutive modeling. The present paper aim is to compare the constitutive models to fit the stress-strain curves. The accurate deformation behavior of the SS 304 tubes depends on the constitutive modeling of hardening behavior. Deformation data of the tensile specimens cut from tubular sample were collected by conducting Uniaxial tensile tests (UTT) at three different rolling directions. Five constitutive relationships were then recognized by fitting the true stress and strain data with the constitutive models of Hollomon, Power, Krupowsky, Voce and Ghosh, and the fitting accuracy were analyzed and compared. Effects of hardening models on Forming Limit Curves (FLC), pressure loading and bulge height of the hydroformed tube were then studied. The obtained FLC from the simulations were compared with experimental FLC to predict the accuracy of the hardening models.

Suggested Citation

  • Pathapalli Venkateshwar Reddy & B. Veerabhadra Reddy & Perumalla Janaki Ramulu & U. Pranavi, 2022. "Comparison of Constitutive Models for Predicting the Formability of SS 304 by Tubular Hydroforming Process," International Journal of Manufacturing, Materials, and Mechanical Engineering (IJMMME), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jmmme0:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:1-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJMMME.293227
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jmmme0:v:12:y:2022:i:1:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.