IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jmdem0/v12y2021i1p33-48.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Graph Kernels and Clustering Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Riju Bhattacharya

    (National Institute of Technology, Raipur, India)

  • Naresh Kumar Nagwani

    (National Institute of Technology, Raipur, India)

  • Sarsij Tripathi

    (Motilal Nehru National Institute of Technology, Allahabad, India)

Abstract

Graph kernels have evolved as a promising and popular method for graph clustering over the last decade. In this work, comparative study on the five standard graph kernel techniques for graph clustering has been performed. The graph kernels, namely vertex histogram kernel, shortest path kernel, graphlet kernel, k-step random walk kernel, and Weisfeiler-Lehman kernel have been compared for graph clustering. The clustering methods considered for the kernel comparison are hierarchical, k-means, model-based, fuzzy-based, and self-organizing map clustering techniques. The comparative study of kernel methods over the clustering techniques is performed on MUTAG benchmark dataset. Clustering performance is assessed with internal validation performance parameters such as connectivity, Dunn, and the silhouette index. Finally, the comparative analysis is done to facilitate researchers for selecting the appropriate kernel method for effective graph clustering. The proposed methodology elicits k-step random walk and shortest path kernel have performed best among all graph clustering approaches.

Suggested Citation

  • Riju Bhattacharya & Naresh Kumar Nagwani & Sarsij Tripathi, 2021. "A Comparative Study of Graph Kernels and Clustering Algorithms," International Journal of Multimedia Data Engineering and Management (IJMDEM), IGI Global, vol. 12(1), pages 33-48, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jmdem0:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:33-48
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJMDEM.2021010103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jmdem0:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:33-48. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.