IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jkss00/v9y2018i4p66-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Proposition of a New Service Value Evaluation Model based on the SLA Concept for Social Infrastructure Service

Author

Listed:
  • Masahiko Suzuki

    (Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Japan)

  • Michitaka Kosaka

    (School of Knowledge Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Japan)

Abstract

This article proposes a new service value evaluation model for social infrastructure services. Existing service concepts or models are designed based on direct interaction between providers and customers. The service provider provides customized service to grow each customer's satisfaction. In contrast, social infrastructure service have few direct interactions between providers and customers. In addition, the provider cannot provide customized service to each customer. Because the social infrastructure service has different characteristics, this article proposes a new service concept “SISLA (Social Infrastructure Service Level Agreement)” based on the concept of SLA (Service Level Agreement). Furthermore, this article proposes a new service value evaluation model. This article shows the validity of the SISLA evaluation model by applying this model to an actual case. For social infrastructure service providers, this model may be able to make an appropriate decision to provide better service for customers while ensuring provider's profits.

Suggested Citation

  • Masahiko Suzuki & Michitaka Kosaka, 2018. "A Proposition of a New Service Value Evaluation Model based on the SLA Concept for Social Infrastructure Service," International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science (IJKSS), IGI Global, vol. 9(4), pages 66-85, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jkss00:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:66-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJKSS.2018100104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jkss00:v:9:y:2018:i:4:p:66-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.