IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jkss00/v7y2016i4p60-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge-Scientific Evaluation of a Social Service System

Author

Listed:
  • Fei Meng

    (Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Japan)

  • Yoshiteru Nakamori

    (Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Japan)

  • Van-Nam Huynh

    (Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Nomi, Japan)

Abstract

This paper proposes a new evaluation method for a social service system in order to support participants to create new knowledge and value. The main proposal is a rating scale method that can evaluate the current level (as-is) and the future desire (to-be) of participants, and with which the authors can analyze achievements of individuals. By using a concrete example of an education program which is a worth living discovery seminar for retired men, the paper reports the results of hypothetical tests on the relationships between items of evaluation, and an interesting finding related to the reason of differences in attitude of participants.

Suggested Citation

  • Fei Meng & Yoshiteru Nakamori & Van-Nam Huynh, 2016. "Knowledge-Scientific Evaluation of a Social Service System," International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science (IJKSS), IGI Global, vol. 7(4), pages 60-77, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jkss00:v:7:y:2016:i:4:p:60-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJKSS.2016100104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jkss00:v:7:y:2016:i:4:p:60-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.