IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jkss00/v12y2021i3p21-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Methodology of Task Allocation to Design a Human-Robot Assembly Line: Integration of DFA Ergonomics and Time-Cost Effectiveness Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Anh Vo Ngoc Tram

    (School of Management Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Thailand)

  • Morrakot Raweewan

    (School of Management Technology, Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Thailand)

Abstract

There are successful cases in lean manual assembly lines; however, in some cases, such as the ease of assembly in quicker cycle time, the designs are not satisfactory and must be transformed to semi-automation. This research studies human-robot task allocation when designing for semi-automation considering not only time-cost effectiveness as in the existing research but also assembly difficulty and ergonomic issues. A proposed methodology optimally determines what tasks should be performed by humans or robots, at which station, and in what sequence. A multi-objective linear programming (MOLP) model is proposed to simultaneously minimize total operating cost, cycle time, and ergonomic difficulty. Solving the model has two approaches: with and without optimal weights. The methodology is applied to a Lego-car assembly line. To illustrate the benefits of the proposed MOLP, a comparison between it and three single-objective models is made. Results show that the optimal-weight MOLP yields a better performance (a shorter cycle time, a lower cost, and especially, a significant ergonomic improvement) when compared to the other MOLP and single-objective models.

Suggested Citation

  • Anh Vo Ngoc Tram & Morrakot Raweewan, 2021. "A Methodology of Task Allocation to Design a Human-Robot Assembly Line: Integration of DFA Ergonomics and Time-Cost Effectiveness Optimization," International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science (IJKSS), IGI Global, vol. 12(3), pages 21-52, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jkss00:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:21-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJKSS.2021070102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jkss00:v:12:y:2021:i:3:p:21-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.