IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jkss00/v11y2020i4p17-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

QoE-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Resource Provisioning in Fog Computing Using AHP Technique

Author

Listed:
  • Shefali Varshney

    (Jaypee University of Information Technology, India)

  • Rajinder Sandhu

    (Jaypee University of Information Technology, India)

  • P. K. Gupta

    (Jaypee University of Information Technology, India)

Abstract

Application placement in the fog environment is becoming one of the major challenges because of its distributed, hierarchical, and heterogeneous nature. Also, user expectations and various features of IoT devices further increase the complexity of the problem for the placement of applications in the fog computing environment. Therefore, to improve the QoE of various end-users for the use of various system services, proper placement of applications in the fog computing environment plays an important role. In this paper, the authors have proposed a service placement methodology for the fog computing environment. For a better selection of application services, AHP technique has been used which provides results in the form of ranks. The performance evaluation of the proposed technique has been done by using a customized testbed that considers the parameters like CPU cycle, storage, maximum latency, processing speed, and network bandwidth. Experimental results obtained for the proposed methodology improved the efficiency of the fog network.

Suggested Citation

  • Shefali Varshney & Rajinder Sandhu & P. K. Gupta, 2020. "QoE-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Resource Provisioning in Fog Computing Using AHP Technique," International Journal of Knowledge and Systems Science (IJKSS), IGI Global, vol. 11(4), pages 17-30, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jkss00:v:11:y:2020:i:4:p:17-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJKSS.2020100102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jkss00:v:11:y:2020:i:4:p:17-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.