IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jkm000/v21y2025i1p1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in AI-Enhanced Education: A Critical Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends and Collaboration Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Li

    (School of Law, Henan University of Science and Technology, China)

  • Quanwei Huang

    (School of Law, Henan University of Science and Technology, China)

Abstract

With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) in education, AI-enhanced learning is driving profound pedagogical shifts, offering personalized teaching and resource optimization while raising ethical concerns such as data privacy, algorithmic bias, intellectual property, transparency, and equity. Using bibliometric methods, the authors of this study systematically analyzed global research on AI ethics in education over the past decade, revealing its dynamic evolution. AI ethics in education research has grown exponentially, shifting from early technical feasibility studies to the ethical risks of generative AI in specific scenarios. However, research remains technology-centric, lacking focus on appropriate educational contexts. The international network is dominated by the United States, China, and European Union countries, with limited participation from developing nations. This study also examines ethical dilemmas and gaps in current research frameworks, aiming to provide insights for academics, policymakers, and future studies.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Li & Quanwei Huang, 2025. "Navigating Ethical Dilemmas in AI-Enhanced Education: A Critical Bibliometric Analysis of Global Research Trends and Collaboration Networks," International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), IGI Global, vol. 21(1), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jkm000:v:21:y:2025:i:1:p:1-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJKM.382384
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jkm000:v:21:y:2025:i:1:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.