IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jitwe0/v4y2009i4p36-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Research Methods Used in Moving the Traditional Usability Approach Towards a User-Centered Design Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Horia D. Pitariu

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Romania)

  • Daniela M. Andrei

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Romania)

  • Adriana M. Guran

    (Babes-Bolyai University, Romania)

Abstract

The present chapter focuses on the idea of rethinking the concept of usability moving from the traditional view of usability expressed in the internal characteristics of the product towards usability understood as deriving from the quality of interactions between humans, their work and the web design product. Usability is not only an add-on or a final result in the design process but it is embedded as a main concern within the design process itself. Related to this perspective on usability, the authors discussed the design models which can support it and argued on the importance of using social research tools for a better understanding of the people and their needs starting with the very first stage of design. Further on the authors have provided a brief description of the most frequently used research methods in user needs analysis (interviews, focus groups and surveys) together with short guidelines in preparing and using these methods. The last part is dedicated to the illustration of user needs analysis taken from two of their research projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Horia D. Pitariu & Daniela M. Andrei & Adriana M. Guran, 2009. "Social Research Methods Used in Moving the Traditional Usability Approach Towards a User-Centered Design Approach," International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering (IJITWE), IGI Global, vol. 4(4), pages 36-53, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jitwe0:v:4:y:2009:i:4:p:36-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jitwe.2009100103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jitwe0:v:4:y:2009:i:4:p:36-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.