IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jitpm0/v4y2013i2p50-74.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Big Vendor vs. Little Vendor: Managing the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Project to Overcome the Laggard Sales Barrier

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Cua

    (FCC Consultants, Inc., Quezon City, Philippines)

  • Steve Reames

    (College of Business Administration, A’Sharqiyah University, Seeb, Oman)

Abstract

The majority of international organizations, especially technologist “fast or first movers” who invest in a new enterprise resource planning systems (ERP) project are considered Laggards or “late arrivers” by a major software vendor. The majority of the Laggards segment does not purchase ERP software from a vendor without an established track record. Obviously, small or less prestigious vendors have difficulty fulfilling their bottom line without tapping the Laggards market. This paper is a critical and non-empirical review to better understand this complex phenomenon. A case study was conducted within a large public sector university in Australasia during a major ERP-managed project utilizing the Diffusion of Innovations theory integrating it with the concepts of internationalization. The findings confirm that small software vendors have a great challenge to overcome. But the Diffusion of Innovation could be one of many social analysis building blocks for promoting the “Little Vendor” over the “Big Vendor.”

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Cua & Steve Reames, 2013. "Big Vendor vs. Little Vendor: Managing the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Project to Overcome the Laggard Sales Barrier," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global, vol. 4(2), pages 50-74, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:4:y:2013:i:2:p:50-74
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jitpm.2013040104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:4:y:2013:i:2:p:50-74. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.