IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jitpm0/v4y2013i2p35-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making in R&D Project Manager Selection

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammed A. Hajeeh

    (Techno-Economics Division, Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Safat, Kuwait)

Abstract

Project managers perform better and lead projects to a successful end if their characteristics match with the requirements of the position. Manager of a research project should not only have a solid scientific background, but also possess attributes of a leader. Incompetent research and development (R&D) managers can cause grievances, complaints, employee turnover, and organizational disruptions. The process of selecting the best project manager among several candidates involves comparing both tangible and intangible attributes. Such a complex problem involves satisfying several objectives simultaneously. Hence the most suitable methods are multi-criteria decision making techniques. In this article, a fuzzy linguistic problem is addressed using the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to identify the most suitable manager to lead an R&D project. A selection committee of five experts is formed to choose the best applicant on the basis of eight criteria. In the final analysis, leadership is found to be the most important criterion followed by scientific accomplishments.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammed A. Hajeeh, 2013. "Application of Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Making in R&D Project Manager Selection," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global, vol. 4(2), pages 35-49, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:4:y:2013:i:2:p:35-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jitpm.2013040103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:4:y:2013:i:2:p:35-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.