IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jitpm0/v3y2012i3p14-30.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information Technology Governance in Practice: A Project Management Office’s Use of Early Risk Assessment as a Relational Mechanism

Author

Listed:
  • Hazel Taylor

    (University of Washington, USA)

  • Jill Palzkill Woelfer

    (University of Washington, USA)

  • Edward Artman

    (City of Seattle, Washington, USA)

Abstract

This paper compares implementation frameworks for Information Technology (IT) governance and functions of a Project Management Office (PMO). While there are commonalities, the relational mechanisms called for in IT governance frameworks are omitted from the PMO functions. The authors provide a case study of a PMO at a large municipal government organization where relational mechanisms are incorporated into the risk assessment process through the use of a risk profile spider chart. Drawing conclusions from collaborative practice research, the authors discuss the use and relational aspects of the risk profile spider chart and show how this tool enables boundary spanning between the PMO and other departments by functioning as a boundary object-in-use, increasing the likelihood of buy-in for IT governance decisions. The authors conclude that the tool has potential both as a risk assessment mechanism and a boundary object for building collaboration and thus may be useful for PMOs at other organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Hazel Taylor & Jill Palzkill Woelfer & Edward Artman, 2012. "Information Technology Governance in Practice: A Project Management Office’s Use of Early Risk Assessment as a Relational Mechanism," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global, vol. 3(3), pages 14-30, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:3:y:2012:i:3:p:14-30
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jitpm.2012070102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:3:y:2012:i:3:p:14-30. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.