IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jitpm0/v13y2022i3p1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Website Efficacy for Life Insurance Companies: Insights From a Best-Worst Method

Author

Listed:
  • Anupriya Kaur

    (Jaypee University of Information Technology, India)

Abstract

Given the proliferation of websites which act as digital channels for life insurance companies, a competitive situation has emerged with each vying for the web user's attention and patronage. Web efficacy is vital for creating an impressive online experience and gaining customer patronage. To facilitate the understanding of website managers on specific aspects which matter the most to customers, this study employs the best-worst method to evaluate the importance of various criteria employed by the web users to assess these digital options. Additionally, using four life insurance websites (LIC, SBI Life, HDFC Life Insurance, and Max Life Insurance) as alternatives, the study helps illustrate the competitive position of the websites based on key criteria: trust, visual appeal, innovativeness, information fit-to-task, tailored information, response time, intuitive operations, and relative advantage. The results of this study are easily interpretable and can provide key insights on the specific attributes in a comparative manner for website administrators and managers.

Suggested Citation

  • Anupriya Kaur, 2022. "Perceived Website Efficacy for Life Insurance Companies: Insights From a Best-Worst Method," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global, vol. 13(3), pages 1-21, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:1-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJITPM.313631
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:13:y:2022:i:3:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.