IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jitpm0/v11y2020i3p77-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Probabilistic Method for Managing Common Risks in Software Project Scheduling Based on Program Evaluation Review Technique

Author

Listed:
  • Quyet-Thang Huynh

    (Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Vietnam)

  • Ngoc-Tuan Nguyen

    (Hanoi University of Science and Technology, Vietnam)

Abstract

Project management and project scheduling are crucial to help development teams keep track of timing as well as resource allocation. In order to manage software projects, project managers need to anticipate, analyze the risk factors that may occur as well as their impacts on the progress of the project, and assess and adapt the project resource allocation. This paper concentrates on a quantitative approach for risk analysis in software project scheduling by taking advantage of Bayesian networks capacity (including related mathematical calculations) in modeling and assessing uncertainty and incorporates them in software project scheduling with program evaluation and review technique (PERT). Common risk factors in project scheduling are also examined, and a Bayesian networks model of 19 common risk factors and their causal relationships is proposed and confirmed. The research also borrows and implements categories and levels of risk from construction projects into software projects. A tool was built to experiment and validate the proposed model.

Suggested Citation

  • Quyet-Thang Huynh & Ngoc-Tuan Nguyen, 2020. "Probabilistic Method for Managing Common Risks in Software Project Scheduling Based on Program Evaluation Review Technique," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global, vol. 11(3), pages 77-94, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:11:y:2020:i:3:p:77-94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJITPM.2020070105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:11:y:2020:i:3:p:77-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.