IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jitbag/v9y2018i1p38-52.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shared Understanding in IT Governance and IT Management Implementation: An Analysis of Different Stakeholder Viewpoints

Author

Listed:
  • Tim Huygh

    (Antwerp Management School, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Anant Joshi

    (Department of Organization and Strategy, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands)

  • Steven De Haes

    (Antwerp Management School, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium)

  • Wim Van Grembergen

    (Antwerp Management School, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium)

Abstract

This article examines the association between stakeholder functional role and the perceived level of IT governance and IT management implementation. Specifically, this article takes a COBIT 5 perspective, by first analyzing perception differences at the level of the implementation of the seven COBIT 5 enablers, followed by an analysis at the level of the COBIT 5 process domains. The results indicate that a shared understanding about the IT governance and IT management implementation level between different organizational stakeholders can be improved, especially between (1) IT and (2) audit, risk, and compliance (ARC) stakeholders. As IT governance is seen as a critical enabler for the achievement of IT business value, an appropriate level of shared understanding about its implementation level among important stakeholder groups should be achieved.

Suggested Citation

  • Tim Huygh & Anant Joshi & Steven De Haes & Wim Van Grembergen, 2018. "Shared Understanding in IT Governance and IT Management Implementation: An Analysis of Different Stakeholder Viewpoints," International Journal of IT/Business Alignment and Governance (IJITBAG), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 38-52, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jitbag:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:38-52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJITBAG.2018010103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jitbag:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:38-52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.