IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jisss0/v1y2009i4p33-49.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived Risk for Multiple Services in the Consumer Buying Cycle

Author

Listed:
  • Lawrence F. Cunningham

    (University of Colorado Denver, USA)

  • James Gerlach

    (University of Colorado Denver, USA)

  • Michael D. Harper

    (University of Colorado Denver, USA)

  • Deborah L. Kellogg

    (University of Colorado Denver, USA)

Abstract

This study compares consumer perceived risk between five e-service delivery systems and their traditional (non-Internet) counterparts over each stage of the buying cycle. Using a survey methodology, the authors find that in general consumers perceive e-services as riskier than traditional services. The difference in perceived risk, which the authors define as the Internet risk premium, is significant for each service and each stage of the buying cycle. There is a spike in perceived risk at the purchase stage in the buying cycle for each of the five services. This pattern is also evident in the four services with traditional delivery systems. Perceived risk affects the consumer throughout the buying cycle and is not alleviated in the information search stage. Different risk factors drive perceived risk at various stages in the buying cycle. The authors provide both research and managerial implications of these findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Lawrence F. Cunningham & James Gerlach & Michael D. Harper & Deborah L. Kellogg, 2009. "Perceived Risk for Multiple Services in the Consumer Buying Cycle," International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector (IJISSS), IGI Global, vol. 1(4), pages 33-49, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jisss0:v:1:y:2009:i:4:p:33-49
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jisss.2009062903
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jisss0:v:1:y:2009:i:4:p:33-49. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.