IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jissc0/v6y2015i2p16-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the Usability of E-Voting Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Jeffrey Hsu

    (Fairleigh Dickinson University, Department of Information Systems and Decision Sciences, Madison, NJ, USA)

  • Qiyang Chen

    (Department of Management and Information Systems, Montclair State University, Upper Montclair, NJ, USA)

  • Gary Bronson

    (Department of Information Systems and Decision Sciences Fairleigh Dickinson University, Madison, NJ, USA)

Abstract

Voting has been an accepted means for electing candidates, receiving public approval for referendums and budgets, and for many other tasks where the will of the people, whether a broad population or a select group, can be recorded and measured in a tangible way. Because of advances in technology, together with problems inherent in manual forms of voting, the concepts and issues relating to electronic voting (e-voting) and various other technology-based forms, are been proposed, discussed, and examined. The goal of all such systems is the casting and recording of the votes from eligible voters as they intended to be cast, with adequate security. This security requires that there be no identifiable connection between the voter and the vote that is cast, while providing an audit trail that can be used to validate that every vote was counted and tallied, as cast. The focus of this paper is to examine electronic voting technologies from the perspective of usability in controlled environments. Current research has shown that such systems form the majority of the nascent e-voting technologies, primarily because they have come closest to solving the usability and security issues inherent in technology–based voting systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeffrey Hsu & Qiyang Chen & Gary Bronson, 2015. "Evaluating the Usability of E-Voting Technologies," International Journal of Information Systems and Social Change (IJISSC), IGI Global, vol. 6(2), pages 16-33, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jissc0:v:6:y:2015:i:2:p:16-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijissc.2015040102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jissc0:v:6:y:2015:i:2:p:16-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.