IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jicthd/v10y2018i3p28-38.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of VoxelNet and PointNet for 3D Object Detection in Car by Using KITTI Benchmark

Author

Listed:
  • Harish S. Gujjar

    (Department of Computer Science, SSA Government First Grade College, Ballari, India)

Abstract

In today's world, 2D object recognition is a normal course of study in research. 3D objection recognition is more in demand and important in the present scenario. 3D object recognition has gained importance in areas such as navigation of vehicles, robotic vision, HoME, virtual reality, etc. This work reveals the two important methods, Voxelnet and PointNet, useful in 3D object recognition. In case of NetPoint, the recognition is good when used with segmentation of point clouds which are in small-scale. Whereas, in case of Voxelnet, scans are used directly on raw points of clouds which are directly operated on patterns. The above conclusion is arrived on KITTI car detection. The KITTI uses detection by using bird's eye view. In this method of KITTI we compare two different methods called LiDAR and RGB-D. We arrive at a conclusion that pointNet is useful and has high performance when we are using small scenarios and Voxelnet is useful and has high performance when we are using large scenarios.

Suggested Citation

  • Harish S. Gujjar, 2018. "A Comparative Study of VoxelNet and PointNet for 3D Object Detection in Car by Using KITTI Benchmark," International Journal of Information Communication Technologies and Human Development (IJICTHD), IGI Global, vol. 10(3), pages 28-38, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jicthd:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:28-38
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJICTHD.2018070103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jicthd:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:28-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.