IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jhisi0/v8y2013i3p38-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Electronic Medical Records and Public Perceptions: A Deliberative Process

Author

Listed:
  • Tarik Abdel-Monem

    (University of Nebraska Public Policy Center, Lincoln, NE, USA)

  • Mitchel N. Herian

    (University of Nebraska Public Policy Center, Lincoln, NE, USA)

  • Nancy Shank

    (University of Nebraska Public Policy Center, Lincoln, NE, USA)

Abstract

Public attitudes about electronic medical records (EMRs) have been primarily gauged by one-time opinion polls. The authors investigated the impact of an interactive deliberative polling process on general attitudes towards EMRs and perceptions of governmental roles in the area. An initial online survey was conducted about EMRs among a sample of respondents (n = 138), and then surveyed a sub-sample after they had engaged in a deliberative discussion about EMR issues with peers and policymakers (n = 24). Significant changes in opinions about EMRs and governmental roles were found following the deliberative discussion. Overall support for EMRs increased significantly, although concerns about security and confidentiality remained. This indicates that one way to address concerns about EMRs is to provide opportunities for deliberation with policymakers. The policy and theoretical implications of these findings are briefly discussed within.

Suggested Citation

  • Tarik Abdel-Monem & Mitchel N. Herian & Nancy Shank, 2013. "Electronic Medical Records and Public Perceptions: A Deliberative Process," International Journal of Healthcare Information Systems and Informatics (IJHISI), IGI Global, vol. 8(3), pages 38-57, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jhisi0:v:8:y:2013:i:3:p:38-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jhisi.2013070103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jhisi0:v:8:y:2013:i:3:p:38-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.