IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jhcitp/v7y2016i1p66-85.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Effectiveness of Interactive and Collaborative Resources to Improve Reading and Writing in English

Author

Listed:
  • Ana María Pinto Llorente

    (Pontifical University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain)

  • María Cruz Sánchez Gómez

    (University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain)

  • Francisco José García-Peñalvo

    (Computer Science Department, University of Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain)

Abstract

This paper presents a mixed research developed at the Pontifical University of Salamanca with students of intermediate level of English. It examines the effectiveness of the application of interactive and collaborative resources to improve reading and writing in English. Based on the overall evaluation of the blended course, most students believe that online glossary, online questionnaire, wiki and forum are good tools to improve their written skills. They are strongly aware of the necessity of improving these skills, and consider that the activities designed through these technological tools have allowed them to foster effective written communication in a variety of situations. Students also emphasize the potential of collaborative tools to communicate and develop collaborative learning. However, some students consider that there is a lack of privacy and fluency in communication, and believe that interactions are impersonal and disorganized, so they have had problems to do the activities and communicate suitably.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana María Pinto Llorente & María Cruz Sánchez Gómez & Francisco José García-Peñalvo, 2016. "Assessing the Effectiveness of Interactive and Collaborative Resources to Improve Reading and Writing in English," International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), IGI Global, vol. 7(1), pages 66-85, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jhcitp:v:7:y:2016:i:1:p:66-85
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJHCITP.2016010105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jhcitp:v:7:y:2016:i:1:p:66-85. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.