IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jhcitp/v4y2013i3p26-39.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Network Analysis to Improve Decision Making for Partner Selection in Inter-Organizational Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Laura Ponisio

    (BE Software Design, Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Pascal van Eck

    (University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands)

  • Lourens Riemens

    (Dutch Tax and Customs Administration, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Professionals in decision making roles are often faced with the problem of choosing partners for closer cooperation, for instance, to start new joint IT development projects or for harvesting best practices. The large amounts of information involved in these decision processes obscure possibilities, and therefore choices are made ad hoc. In this article, the authors present an approach that uses concrete data and network analysis to support decision makers in processing and understanding this information. Central in the authors’ approach are questionnaires capturing aspired and current development levels of the processes of the cooperating organizations and graphs generated using network analysis techniques. The advantage of the authors’ approach, which they validated via expert interviews, is that results are semi-automatically translated to visualizations; which in turn offer an overall view of the current and aspired situation in the network without losing the ability to pinpoint particular, individual processes of interest. This, in turn, enables IT professionals to make better decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Laura Ponisio & Pascal van Eck & Lourens Riemens, 2013. "Using Network Analysis to Improve Decision Making for Partner Selection in Inter-Organizational Networks," International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), IGI Global, vol. 4(3), pages 26-39, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jhcitp:v:4:y:2013:i:3:p:26-39
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jhcitp.2013070103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jhcitp:v:4:y:2013:i:3:p:26-39. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.