IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jfsa00/v4y2015i2p28-46.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking CNC Machine Tool Using Hybrid-Fuzzy Methodology: A Multi-Indices Decision Making (MCDM) Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Anoop Kumar Sahu

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, NIT, Rourkela, India)

  • Nitin Kumar Sahu

    (Department of Industrial & Production Engineering, Guru Ghasidas Central University, Bilaspur, India)

  • Atul Kumar Sahu

    (Department of Industrial & Production Engineering, Guru Ghasidas Central University, Bilaspur, India)

Abstract

In today's era, managerial decision making has become a very momentous component due to the leverage of attention on achieving organizational goal i.e. enhancing effective utilization of input assets, satisfying customers' demand and minimizing loss (maximize profit). The evaluation of the most appropriate Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machine tool has become one of the key factors for sustaining the organization/manufacturing sectors/production units at competitive global market place. Productivity, precision and accuracy etc. are the most important issues behind adaptation/exploration of CNC machine tools. So, in such a cases, subjective indices are considered beside the objective indices and complexity of the CNC machine tool evaluation decision problems is solved via subjective assessments (judgment) of expert panel, also called the decision-making group. In this reporting, TOPSIS (technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution) based Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) approach has fruitfully applied to emphasize the decision making scenario at the subjective information evaluation index (indices) platform. So, TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) analytical methodology conjunction with Trapezoidal Fuzzy Number (TFN) has been explored for assessing and benchmarking the most preferable CNC machine tool from a group of preferred options/alternatives. Finally, an empirical case study has been carried out check the feasibility, efficiency and validity of proposed methodology and the benchmarking of preferred alternative machine tool has been derived in accordance with descending value of the ‘collective index'. Higher value of ‘collective index' reflects higher degree of performance extent.

Suggested Citation

  • Anoop Kumar Sahu & Nitin Kumar Sahu & Atul Kumar Sahu, 2015. "Benchmarking CNC Machine Tool Using Hybrid-Fuzzy Methodology: A Multi-Indices Decision Making (MCDM) Approach," International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications (IJFSA), IGI Global, vol. 4(2), pages 28-46, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jfsa00:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:28-46
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJFSA.2015040103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jfsa00:v:4:y:2015:i:2:p:28-46. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.