IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jfsa00/v2y2012i1p35-53.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Selecting Adequate Security Mechanisms in E-Business Processes Using Fuzzy TOPSIS

Author

Listed:
  • Shahriar Mohammadi

    (K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Iran)

  • Sina Golara

    (K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Iran)

  • Nasim Mousavi

    (K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Iran)

Abstract

Security mechanisms are substantial to an e-business environment. While many security mechanisms have been developed to secure e-business processes (EBP) and networks, little attention is given to actual process of a systematic decision making. In most cases strongest security level available is selected. In many cases there are low risks and threats associated with the processes and the use of strong security wastes the available resources. In this paper the authors developed a practical multiple criteria decision making model based on the group fuzzy technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution (GFTOPSIS) for choosing adequate security mechanism for e-business processes and making a trade-off between security and other important factors in the enterprise. Data was acquired from experts and implemented fuzzy approach. The authors differentiated four phases in the EBP. Each phase of the process which has specific security requirements thus we suggested the use of specified security mechanisms for each phase which improves the efficiency of the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahriar Mohammadi & Sina Golara & Nasim Mousavi, 2012. "Selecting Adequate Security Mechanisms in E-Business Processes Using Fuzzy TOPSIS," International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications (IJFSA), IGI Global, vol. 2(1), pages 35-53, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jfsa00:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:35-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijfsa.2012010103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jfsa00:v:2:y:2012:i:1:p:35-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.