IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jepr00/v5y2016i2p40-54.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Visual Comparison of Web Map Changes of Openstreetmap and Commercial Online-Map Providers: A Research Note

Author

Listed:
  • Beata Ćmielová

    (Palacky University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic)

  • Jiří Pánek

    (Palacky University in Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Maps always have and always will have blank spots, but maps are no longer the privilege of paper; they have been moved to the digital environment. How can digital maps fill the empty spaces in the current online and crowdsourcing mapping era? In this paper the authors pose several questions and in the same breath they are aware that some of those questions may not be answered. The paper presents the research note with use of visual comparison method, that may not provide concrete results, but merely a glipse of the situation Who does cover certain areas better – OpenStreetMap or commercial providers? And what does “better” coverage actually mean? Mapping the unmapped is not only a question of spatial literacy, but also part of the GeoParticipation and democratisation process taking place within the digital spatial industry of today. The authors focus their research on three areas (Kibera, Minsk and North Korea). The research covers 18 months of data for three major commercial providers and for one collaborative platform – OpenStreetMap.

Suggested Citation

  • Beata Ćmielová & Jiří Pánek, 2016. "Visual Comparison of Web Map Changes of Openstreetmap and Commercial Online-Map Providers: A Research Note," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 5(2), pages 40-54, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jepr00:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:40-54
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJEPR.2016040103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jepr00:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:40-54. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.