IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jepr00/v10y2021i1p39-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multicriteria Methodology for Open Space Analysis: Understanding Environmental Performance and Diversity

Author

Listed:
  • Nagore Urrutia del Campo

    (University of the Basque Country, Spain)

  • Olatz Grijalba Aseguinolaza

    (University of the Basque Country, Spain)

  • Rufino Hernandez Minguillón

    (University of the Basque Country, Spain)

Abstract

This paper describes an urban analysis method for the evaluation of the diversity of open spaces. Diversity is understood as the variety of options that a public space offers to the users, giving them the opportunity to choose the area which best suits their needs, activities, and personal preferences. The method facilitates an environmental quality assessment and comparative evaluation between spaces. Decision support tools based on data analysis are developed to facilitate technical urban design decisions. The methodology is based on a multi-criteria analysis of a public square in Madrid, Spain. Field measurements of climatic data and thermal properties of materials, the activities carried out by people and their location, as well as factors related to urban design are collated in the analysis. Data are complimented with bioclimatic and simulation tools. The analysis identifies differentiated thermal profiles, as well as patterns of use of the space. This enables the identification of specific locations currently favored by citizens and the microclimatic and spatial variety of the square.

Suggested Citation

  • Nagore Urrutia del Campo & Olatz Grijalba Aseguinolaza & Rufino Hernandez Minguillón, 2021. "Multicriteria Methodology for Open Space Analysis: Understanding Environmental Performance and Diversity," International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), IGI Global, vol. 10(1), pages 39-57, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jepr00:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:39-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJEPR.2021010103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jepr00:v:10:y:2021:i:1:p:39-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.