IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jeoe00/v7y2018i4p92-108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Optimized Least Square Support Vector Machine and Genetic Programming for Accurate Estimation of Drilling Rate of Penetration

Author

Listed:
  • Meysam Naderi

    (Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran)

  • Ehsan Khamehchi

    (Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran)

Abstract

This article describes how the accurate estimation of the rate of penetration (ROP) is essential to minimize drilling costs. There are various factors influencing ROP such as formation rock, drilling fluid properties, wellbore geometry, type of bit, hydraulics, weight on bit, flow rate and bit rotation speed. This paper presents two novel methods based on least square support vector machine (LSSVM) and genetic programming (GP). Models are a function of depth, weight on bit, rotation speed, stand pipe pressure, flow rate, mud weight, bit rotational hours, plastic viscosity, yield point, 10 second gel strength, 10 minute gel strength, and fluid loss. Results show that LSSVM estimates 92% of field data with average absolute relative error of less than 6%. In addition, sensitivity analysis showed that factors of depth, weight on bit, stand pipe pressure, flow rate and bit rotation speed account for 93% of total variation of ROP. Finally, results indicate that LSSVM is superior over GP in terms of average relative error, average absolute relative error, root mean square error, and the coefficient of determination.

Suggested Citation

  • Meysam Naderi & Ehsan Khamehchi, 2018. "Application of Optimized Least Square Support Vector Machine and Genetic Programming for Accurate Estimation of Drilling Rate of Penetration," International Journal of Energy Optimization and Engineering (IJEOE), IGI Global, vol. 7(4), pages 92-108, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jeoe00:v:7:y:2018:i:4:p:92-108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJEOE.2018100105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jeoe00:v:7:y:2018:i:4:p:92-108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.