IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jeis00/v16y2020i4p161-183.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Fuzzy Lattice Order Group Decision for Preference Ranking in Conflict Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wenyi Wang

    (Southwest Jiaotong University, China)

  • Qiang Guo

    (Southwest Jiaotong University, China)

  • Shunhong Wang

    (Southwest Jiaotong University, China)

Abstract

Methods of fuzzy multi-objective lattice order decision making (F-MOLODM) for analyses of the fuzzy and intransitive preferences of decision makers involved in a conflict analysis are devised for the preference ranking of the states in a conflict, which defines the trapezoidal fuzzy number of the preference and constructs a multi-objective group decision-making fuzzy preference matrix. An algorithm for F-LOGDM is proposed to capture uncertainty and intransitive decision problems, and the relationship among lattice elements of the preference structure under fuzzy environments is defined. The application of these decision technologies to the square dance conflict illustrate how the method proposed in this paper can be utilized in practice. The performance of the lattice order preference ranking method applied to the conflict is compared with that of traditional methods. Research shows that either lattice order preference ranking, or traditional methods acquires Nash stability. However, the stable state under traditional methods will be reached only if all players pay a certain price.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenyi Wang & Qiang Guo & Shunhong Wang, 2020. "Fuzzy Lattice Order Group Decision for Preference Ranking in Conflict Analysis," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 16(4), pages 161-183, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jeis00:v:16:y:2020:i:4:p:161-183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJEIS.2020100108
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jeis00:v:16:y:2020:i:4:p:161-183. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.