IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jeis00/v12y2016i4p47-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Investigation in How Six Sigma Project Teams Should Make Rational Decisions in Shared Leadership Environments

Author

Listed:
  • Brian J. Galli

    (Assistant Professor and Graduate Program Director, Master of Science in Engineering Management Industrial Engineering, Hofstra University, USA)

  • Kathryn Szabat

    (Business Systems and Analytics Department, La Salle University, Philadelphia, PA, USA)

  • Cyrus Mohebbi

    (Morgan Stanley, New York City, NY, USA)

  • Y. Joseph Ugras

    (Accounting Department, La Salle University, Philadelphia, PA, USA)

Abstract

It is proposed that shared leadership environments have an effect on six sigma team decision-making as well as the methods used to make decisions. It is also proposed that the consensus decision-making method is the technique that is the most effective and related to the fundamental conditions of a shared leadership environment. Furthermore, it is believed that a model of shared leadership decision-making can be developed from the results of these hypotheses. Research has found that a strong relationship exists between shared leadership and team decision-making principles and approaches. As a six sigma team becomes more involved in the shared leadership model, the methods utilized to make decisions change in such a way that the power is more distributed among members; the team moves from a single individual decision method, towards a shared decision method. Review of the relationship between shared leadership and team decision-making techniques has shown that the consensus approach is the most effective in satisfying the fundamental conditions and requirements of the shared leadership model. A model of decision-making in shared leadership environments is proposed for use by teams to determine the type of decision-making method that should be employed as a team's level of shared leadership increases.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian J. Galli & Kathryn Szabat & Cyrus Mohebbi & Y. Joseph Ugras, 2016. "An Investigation in How Six Sigma Project Teams Should Make Rational Decisions in Shared Leadership Environments," International Journal of Enterprise Information Systems (IJEIS), IGI Global, vol. 12(4), pages 47-69, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jeis00:v:12:y:2016:i:4:p:47-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJEIS.2016100104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jeis00:v:12:y:2016:i:4:p:47-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.