IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jebr00/v21y2025i1p1-27.html

Value Trade-Offs in Matching Functions: Evidence From Online Labor Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Abdulaziz Alshalfan

    (Kuwait University, Kuwait)

  • Lian Qi

    (Rutgers University, USA)

  • Alok Baveja

    (Rutgers University, USA)

Abstract

Online labor markets (OLMs) face challenges in refining match functions to connect clients with suitable service providers. This study examines how platform-controlled factors (number of assigned providers, matching speed) and project-specific attributes (description length, requested hours) affect matching effectiveness across four outcomes: hiring probability, hiring time, billed hours, and profit per contracted project. Using data from a premium OLM platform, the study reveals important operational and financial trade-offs. Expanding the provider pool improves hiring probability and project profitability but lengthens hiring time. Faster matching boosts hiring likelihood without compromising quality. Larger requested workloads reduce hiring probability but raise profitability. These findings offer actionable insights into how calibrated matching strategies can improve OLM performance across the project lifecycle, contributing to platform governance and digital operations literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdulaziz Alshalfan & Lian Qi & Alok Baveja, 2025. "Value Trade-Offs in Matching Functions: Evidence From Online Labor Markets," International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 21(1), pages 1-27, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jebr00:v:21:y:2025:i:1:p:1-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJEBR.396248
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jebr00:v:21:y:2025:i:1:p:1-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.