IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jea000/v6y2014i1p53-66.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Mobile Application Development Firms: Comparing Views of Advertisers and Advertising Agencies

Author

Listed:
  • Pi-Fang Hsu

    (Department of Communications Management, Shih Hsin University, Taipei, Taiwan)

  • Tien-Chun Lu

    (Department of Communications Management, Shih Hsin University, Taipei, Taiwan)

  • Chia-Wen Tsai

    (Department of Information Management, Ming Chuan University, Taipei, Taiwan)

Abstract

The purpose of the present paper is to propose a decision model for both advertisers and advertising agencies to evaluate and select mobile application development firms. The researchers first refer to related literature and apply the Modified Delphi Method to postulate the most suitable selection criteria. Then, Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is utilized to derive the relative weight and ranking of each decision criteria, which can be used for evaluating and selecting the most suitable mobile application development firm. Then a company, which serves as a case example, is selected for applying this model. The data analysis finds that when selecting mobile application development firms, both advertisers and advertising agencies hold mastery of mobile marketing skill as their top concern. Business marketing division also stress experience in mobile marketing operation, especially ability in innovative layout and execution. In contrast, advertising agencies are able to provide their clients with creative ideas and designs. Therefore, they do not care so much whether marketing application development firms have ability in innovative layout and execution. They are more concerned about ability in customer service, especially team communication and arbitration ability.

Suggested Citation

  • Pi-Fang Hsu & Tien-Chun Lu & Chia-Wen Tsai, 2014. "Evaluating Mobile Application Development Firms: Comparing Views of Advertisers and Advertising Agencies," International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA), IGI Global, vol. 6(1), pages 53-66, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jea000:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:53-66
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijea.2014010104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jea000:v:6:y:2014:i:1:p:53-66. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.