IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jea000/v4y2012i2p28-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Validity and Reliability Study of a Revised Motivated Strategy for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for Assessing Computer Software Learning Strategies

Author

Listed:
  • Catherine Chen

    (Ball State University, USA)

  • Joel Whitesel

    (Ball State University, USA)

Abstract

Instructional theories have shifted from viewing students as reactive learners in the mid-1980s to the current view of students as proactive learners. Emphasis is no longer placed on the teachers to adapt instruction to meet individual student’s mental ability or social-cultural background. In contrast, students are viewed as active participants in their own learning process. Based on the literature and prior research, the purpose of this study is to revise the learning strategy section of the Motivated Strategy for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) to reflect the unique learning strategies involved in learning computer skills. MSLQ is a very widely used instrument to assess students’ motivation and learning strategies. It assumed that learning strategies can be generalized across context, but context affect the learners’ choices and learning strategies available. Although the instrument is effective in assessing strategies used in processing information from texts and lectures, research findings tend to contradict general beliefs when the learning activities involved hands-on, applied learning. With 201 students who participated in the study, this research reports the initial validity and reliability of a revised version of the learning strategies in the MSLQ.

Suggested Citation

  • Catherine Chen & Joel Whitesel, 2012. "The Validity and Reliability Study of a Revised Motivated Strategy for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) for Assessing Computer Software Learning Strategies," International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA), IGI Global, vol. 4(2), pages 28-51, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jea000:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:28-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jea.2012040103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jea000:v:4:y:2012:i:2:p:28-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.