IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jea000/v1y2009i3p1-29.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Pros and Cons of Digital Divide and E-Readiness Assessments

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Reza Hanafizadeh

    (Islamic Azad University, Iran)

  • Payam Hanafizadeh

    (Allameh Tabataba’i University, Iran)

  • Abbas Saghaei

    (Islamic Azad University, Iran)

Abstract

Evolving information and communication technologies (ICTs) have yielded new terms like “information society,” “digital divide,” and “e-readiness” which have attracted many scholars, practitioners, and policymakers. Therefore, in recent years numerous attempts have been done to develop e-readiness and digital divide models oriented toward certain objectives. In this research, these models are investigated with view to their definitions and methodologies, and their strengths and weaknesses are identified. These findings can help researchers and policymakers select the models that fit in with their objectives as well as identify the defects of previous models and rectify them in their own models. Moreover, the extensive literature review led to an integrated model which is proposed to assess the e-readiness of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Such a model can serve as a basis and standard for developing comprehensive models in SMEs.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Reza Hanafizadeh & Payam Hanafizadeh & Abbas Saghaei, 2009. "The Pros and Cons of Digital Divide and E-Readiness Assessments," International Journal of E-Adoption (IJEA), IGI Global, vol. 1(3), pages 1-29, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jea000:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:1-29
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jea.2009092901
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jea000:v:1:y:2009:i:3:p:1-29. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.