IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jdwm00/v14y2018i1p1-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Statistical Entropy Measures in C4.5 Trees

Author

Listed:
  • Aldo Ramirez Arellano

    (Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico)

  • Juan Bory-Reyes

    (Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica Zacatenco, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico)

  • Luis Manuel Hernandez-Simon

    (Escuela Superior de Ingeniería Mecánica y Eléctrica Zacatenco, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City, Mexico)

Abstract

The main goal of this article is to present a statistical study of decision tree learning algorithms based on the measures of different parametric entropies. Partial empirical evidence is presented to support the conjecture that the parameter adjusting of different entropy measures might bias the classification. Here, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, precisely, the area under the ROC curve (AURC) gives the best criterion to evaluate decision trees based on parametric entropies. The authors emphasize that the improvement of the AURC relies on of the type of each dataset. The results support the hypothesis that parametric algorithms are useful for datasets with numeric and nominal, but not for mixed, attributes; thus, four hybrid approaches are proposed. The hybrid algorithm, which is based on Renyi entropy, is suitable for nominal, numeric, and mixed datasets. Moreover, it requires less time when the number of nodes is reduced, when the AURC is maintaining or increasing, thus it is preferable in large datasets.

Suggested Citation

  • Aldo Ramirez Arellano & Juan Bory-Reyes & Luis Manuel Hernandez-Simon, 2018. "Statistical Entropy Measures in C4.5 Trees," International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining (IJDWM), IGI Global, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jdwm00:v:14:y:2018:i:1:p:1-14
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJDWM.2018010101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jdwm00:v:14:y:2018:i:1:p:1-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.