IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jdsst0/v4y2012i3p1-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision Making Modeled as a Theorem Proving Process

Author

Listed:
  • Jacques Calmet

    (Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Germany)

  • Marvin Oliver Schneider

    (Business School São Paulo, Brazil)

Abstract

The authors introduce a theoretical framework enabling to process decisions making along some of the lines and methodologies used to mechanize mathematics and more specifically to mechanize the proofs of theorems. An underlying goal of Decision Support Systems is to trust the decision that is designed. This is also the main goal of their framework. Indeed, the proof of a theorem is always trustworthy. By analogy, this implies that a decision validated through theorem proving methodologies brings trust. To reach such a goal the authors have to rely on a series of abstractions enabling to process all of the knowledge involved in decision making. They deal with an Agent Oriented Abstraction for Multiagent Systems, Object Mechanized Computational Systems, Abstraction Based Information Technology, Virtual Knowledge Communities, topological specification of knowledge bases using Logical Fibering. This approach considers some underlying hypothesis such that knowledge is at the heart of any decision making and that trust transcends the concept of belief. This introduces methodologies from Artificial Intelligence. Another overall goal is to build tools using advanced mathematics for users without specific mathematical knowledge.

Suggested Citation

  • Jacques Calmet & Marvin Oliver Schneider, 2012. "Decision Making Modeled as a Theorem Proving Process," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 4(3), pages 1-11, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:4:y:2012:i:3:p:1-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jdsst.2012070101
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:4:y:2012:i:3:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.