IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jdsst0/v16y2024i1p1-21.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Decision-Making Technique for College Physical Education Teaching Quality Evaluation Based on TODIM and TOPSIS With Interval Neutrosophic Numbers

Author

Listed:
  • Jinyan Yao

    (Department of Physical Education, Shenyang Jianzhu University, China)

  • Bin Xie

    (Jiujiang University, China)

Abstract

The evaluation of university physical education teaching quality is a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of sports courses, aiming to enhance teaching quality and students' physical literacy. The evaluation includes the achievement of teaching objectives, the scientific and practical nature of course content, the innovation and diversity of teaching methods, the professional competence and teaching ability of instructors, and students' participation and progress.The college physical education teaching quality evaluation is multiple-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) approach. Recently, the TODIM and TOPSIS techniques have been employed to address MAGDM challenges. To capture uncertain data during the evaluation process, interval neutrosophic sets (INSs) are administrated as a valuable tool. This study introduces the interval neutrosophic number TODIM-TOPSIS (INN-TODIM-TOPSIS) approach to address MAGDM using INSs. Eventually, numerical study for college physical education teaching quality evaluation is administrated to validate the INN-TODIM-TOPSIS approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinyan Yao & Bin Xie, 2024. "Decision-Making Technique for College Physical Education Teaching Quality Evaluation Based on TODIM and TOPSIS With Interval Neutrosophic Numbers," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 16(1), pages 1-21, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:1-21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJDSST.364845
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:1-21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.