IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jdsst0/v13y2021i4p1-16.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Required Project Designers' Attributes as Perceived by Male and Female Engineers

Author

Listed:
  • Petros Kritikos

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Vasso Papadimitriou

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece)

  • Georgios N. Aretoulis

    (Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece)

Abstract

Project designer (PD) personality defines the way PDs cooperate with the project team, make decisions, and influence the project performance. The current research focused on identifying attributes associated with successful PDs as considered by male and female project engineers. In this context, a five-year questionnaire survey collected 423 responses from Greek engineers. The survey recorded data regarding the respondents and the scores assigned to the required PDs attributes. The methodological approach included an SPSS database, followed by descriptive statistics analysis, independent sample t-test, and correlation analysis. It became obvious that gender influences the assessment and selection of desired PD personality characteristics. Female engineers tend to assign the highest Likert scale-based scores, whereas male respondents tend to assign lower scores. The most highly ranked abilities included “responsibility,” “reliability,” and “obedience to rules.” The findings facilitate the implementation of multi-criteria decision-making tools for efficient project teams.

Suggested Citation

  • Petros Kritikos & Vasso Papadimitriou & Georgios N. Aretoulis, 2021. "Required Project Designers' Attributes as Perceived by Male and Female Engineers," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1-16
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJDSST.2021100102
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:1-16. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.