IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jdsst0/v11y2019i1p93-102.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Criteria Decision Aid for Group Facilitator Election: Application to a Collaborative e-Maintenance Process

Author

Listed:
  • Adnane Laredj

    (LIO Labotory, University of Oran1 Ahmed Benbella, University of Mostaganem, Mostaganem, Algeria)

  • Baroudi Rouba

    (University of Mostaganem. LITIO Laboratory, University of Oran1 Ahmed Benbella, Oran, Algeria)

  • Claude Duvallet

    (Université du Havre, Normandy, France)

Abstract

Group decision support system (GDSS) can be appropriate if used in e-maintenance decision-related meeting as a medium for them to share, extract and analyze the information, and making decision. In addition, in any GDSS, facilitation process is capital, since a facilitator makes meetings more productive and efficient, by managing the content. However, the election of the expert's group facilitator has been only based on networks quality between the expert and the breakdown site, while, according to case study and maintenance expert interviews, facilitator election consists in identifying and choosing alternatives to find the best solution based on different factors. Therefore, in this article, to formalize the problem of facilitator election using multicriteria decision aid concepts, knowing that the difficult point is the multiplicity of the criteria set for judging the alternatives in the group coordination election problem.

Suggested Citation

  • Adnane Laredj & Baroudi Rouba & Claude Duvallet, 2019. "Multi-Criteria Decision Aid for Group Facilitator Election: Application to a Collaborative e-Maintenance Process," International Journal of Decision Support System Technology (IJDSST), IGI Global, vol. 11(1), pages 93-102, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:93-102
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJDSST.2019010105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jdsst0:v:11:y:2019:i:1:p:93-102. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.