IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jdldc0/v2y2011i3p41-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Educators’ Expectations on Technology Enhanced Education (TEE): Should and Could They Be Modified?

Author

Listed:
  • Carlo Giovannella

    (University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy)

  • Claudia Di Lorenzo

    (University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy)

  • Simona Scarsella

    (University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy)

  • Corrado Amedeo Presti

    (University of Rome Tor Vergata, Italy)

Abstract

This paper reports and discusses the result of a survey focused on the perceptions and expectations on TEE applications, conducted among 500 Italian educators (university, high/middle/elementary schools and professionals) involved in on-line or blended learning practices. The expectations are quite basic ones, although may depend on the educational level: support to content sharing and production, communication, assessment and team working are at the top of rank; much less relevant appear to be items like: support to socialization, process design and personalization. Very similar results have been obtained also from a survey among schools’ teachers, novices for TEE, attending a Master in “e-learning: methods, techniques and applications”. The survey was conducted after the conclusion of the first part of the master carried on according to a very traditional distance learning process: content download, self-evaluation tests, tutor assistance upon request. However, after the participation to the second part of the Master, organized as a collaborative, design inspired P3BL (problem, project and process based learning) experience, their opinions on TEE changed in a considerable manner. This indicates how necessary a dissemination action on a large scale among educators with regard to both TEE potentialities and design literacy would be.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlo Giovannella & Claudia Di Lorenzo & Simona Scarsella & Corrado Amedeo Presti, 2011. "Educators’ Expectations on Technology Enhanced Education (TEE): Should and Could They Be Modified?," International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence (IJDLDC), IGI Global, vol. 2(3), pages 41-55, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jdldc0:v:2:y:2011:i:3:p:41-55
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jdldc.2011070104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jdldc0:v:2:y:2011:i:3:p:41-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.