IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcfa00/v5y2018i2p42-64.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Audit Committee Effectiveness and Accounting Conservatism a Test of Lagged Effect

Author

Listed:
  • Saif Ur-Rehman Khan

    (Canadian University of Dubai, Dubai, UAE)

  • Faisal Khan

    (City University College of Ajman, Ajman, UAE)

  • Elgilani Elshareif

    (Canadian University of Dubai, Dubai, UAE)

Abstract

This article examines the effect of audit committee effectiveness on two measures of accounting conservatism. In addition, this article also investigates the interaction effect of four endogenous variables (i.e. firm's operating risks, leverage, managerial influence, firm's size) and three exogenous variables on relationship between audit committee effectiveness and two measures of accounting conservatism. A total of 543 sample firms are selected from the Bursa Malaysia for the period from 2004 to 2013. In addition, some information relating to audit committee and auditor quality are collected from firms' annual reports. For data analysis, panel data methodology is employed, and multiple regression analysis technique is used to test the developed hypotheses of this study. Results show that interaction effect of firm's operating risks, managerial influence, external auditor quality and capital market uncertainty found to be significant with two-year-lagged effect on both measures of conservatism. Whereas, the interaction effect of firm's leverage, firm's size and product market completion are found to be insignificant. The findings of this study contribute to the signaling theory, agency theory, reputation theory and accounting conservatism literature with lagged effect in emerging economies settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Saif Ur-Rehman Khan & Faisal Khan & Elgilani Elshareif, 2018. "Audit Committee Effectiveness and Accounting Conservatism a Test of Lagged Effect," International Journal of Corporate Finance and Accounting (IJCFA), IGI Global, vol. 5(2), pages 42-64, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcfa00:v:5:y:2018:i:2:p:42-64
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJCFA.2018070104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcfa00:v:5:y:2018:i:2:p:42-64. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.