IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcbpl0/v4y2014i1p76-86.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cyberbullying, Sexting, and Online Sharing: A Comparison of Parent and School Faculty Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Thanh Trúc T. Nguyên

    (College of Education, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA)

  • Lauren K. Mark

    (College of Education, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA)

Abstract

Schools are pushing to implement more technology use to promote student learning. Yet, adults may not be completely aware of the non-academic online activities students engage in, like cyberbullying, sexting, and online sharing. In this study, parents (N = 663) and educators (N = 548) from four US states were surveyed on their understanding and awareness of their children's/students' online activities. Adult awareness levels and perspectives were compared. Parents and educators were found to be similarly supportive of computer use adding value to student education, but significantly differed in their trust levels of students' computer usage, preparedness to talk to students about Internet safety issues, and comfort regarding students using online social media. Additionally, parents and educators differed significantly in their understanding of how sharing of explicit material occurs online.

Suggested Citation

  • Thanh Trúc T. Nguyên & Lauren K. Mark, 2014. "Cyberbullying, Sexting, and Online Sharing: A Comparison of Parent and School Faculty Perspectives," International Journal of Cyber Behavior, Psychology and Learning (IJCBPL), IGI Global, vol. 4(1), pages 76-86, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcbpl0:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:76-86
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijcbpl.2014010106
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcbpl0:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:76-86. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.