IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcac00/v4y2014i3p68-80.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ranking Model for SLA Resource Provisioning Management

Author

Listed:
  • C. S. Rajarajeswari

    (Department of Computer Science, Indira Gandhi College of Arts and Science, Puducherry, India)

  • M. Aramudhan

    (Department of Information Technology, Perunthalaivar Kamarajar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Karaikal, India)

Abstract

Cloud computing is an amazing technology, which provides services to users on-demand. Since there are many providers in the cloud, users get confused in selecting the optimal cloud service provider. To overcome this limitation, federated cloud management architecture was proposed. There is no standard framework for ranking the cloud service providers in the existing federated cloud model. The proposed work provides a new federated cloud mechanism, in which Cloud Broker Manager (CBM) takes up the responsibility of resource provisioning and ranking. Differentiated Service Module (DSM) is projected in CBM that classifies the incoming users as SLA or non-SLA members. Dynamic Loose Priority Scheduling (DLPS) is proposed in CBM to manage the number of services. To reduce the overload of the CBM, a secondary CBM (sCBM) is proposed. Experimental results show that the proposed DLPS technique improves the resource provisioning and Quality of Service (QoS) to SLA members and improves the performance of federated cloud by 18% than the existing model.

Suggested Citation

  • C. S. Rajarajeswari & M. Aramudhan, 2014. "Ranking Model for SLA Resource Provisioning Management," International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC), IGI Global, vol. 4(3), pages 68-80, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcac00:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:68-80
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijcac.2014070105
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcac00:v:4:y:2014:i:3:p:68-80. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.