IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jcac00/v15y2025i1p1-35.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mobile Cloud Computing: A Comparison Study of Cuckoo and Aiolos Offloading Frameworks

Author

Listed:
  • Sanjay P. Ahuja

    (University of North Florida, USA)

  • Inan Kaddour

    (University of North Florida, USA)

Abstract

Currently, smart mobile devices are used for more than just calling and texting. They can run complex applications such as GPS, antivirus, and photo editor applications. Smart devices today offer mobility, flexibility, and portability, but they have limited resources and a relatively weak battery. As companies began creating mobile resource-hungry and power-hungry applications, they have realized that cloud computing was one of the solutions that they could utilize to overcome smart device constraints. Cloud computing helps decrease memory usage and improve battery life. Mobile cloud computing is the current and expanding research area focusing on methods that allow smart mobile devices to take full advantage of cloud computing. Code offloading is one of the techniques that is employed in cloud computing with mobile devices. This research compares two dynamic offloading frameworks to determine which one is better in terms of execution time and battery life improvement. While executing light tasks Cuckoo does better with local execution while Aiolos outperforms Cuckoo when offloading a light computation task to the cloud. Similarly, Aiolos performs better than Cuckoo when offloading a heavy computation task to an EC2 instance. Regarding battery consumption, offloading using either framework saves 23% more power than the local environment. Aiolos consumes less battery power than Cuckoo when offloading a heavy computation task.

Suggested Citation

  • Sanjay P. Ahuja & Inan Kaddour, 2025. "Mobile Cloud Computing: A Comparison Study of Cuckoo and Aiolos Offloading Frameworks," International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC), IGI Global, vol. 15(1), pages 1-35, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jcac00:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:1-35
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJCAC.378695
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jcac00:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:1-35. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.