IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jban00/v5y2018i3p33-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi Criteria Decision Model for Risk Assessment of Transmission and Distribution Assets: A Hybrid Approach Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Weighted Sum Method

Author

Listed:
  • Bijoy Chattopadhyay

    (Nevada Energy, Las Vegas, USA)

  • Angelica Rodriguez

    (Nevada Energy, Las Vegas, USA)

Abstract

This article describes how in order to prioritize the risks for a large number of assets, various criteria are used for ranking the asset risk. Since the criteria used for developing the risk rank is a mixture of quantitative and qualitative, a method was required to handle both the quantitative and qualitative criteria with varying scales that can be used for the electrical industry's assets. This article proposes a hybrid multi-criteria decision model (MCDM) that combines both weighted sum model (WSM) and analytical hierarchy process (AHP). The hybrid model is then applied to the strategic asset management plan for the electric power industry for ranking the assets risk. In this application, a large number of criteria reflecting asset conditions with their numerical values are available for which WSM method worked quite efficiently. The AHP method was applied to the criteria where qualitative criteria were available. Both methods were then synthesized, and the proposed hybrid method was formulated which resulted in a computationally efficient outcome with robust mathematical framework. The results show that the proposed method exhibited optimal results for the electric industry's asset where qualitative criteria are for AHP method was limited to 3 to 5. In the case of WSM, a larger number of quantitative criteria could be accommodated although for the application only six criteria were utilized.

Suggested Citation

  • Bijoy Chattopadhyay & Angelica Rodriguez, 2018. "Multi Criteria Decision Model for Risk Assessment of Transmission and Distribution Assets: A Hybrid Approach Using Analytical Hierarchy Process and Weighted Sum Method," International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), IGI Global, vol. 5(3), pages 33-51, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jban00:v:5:y:2018:i:3:p:33-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJBAN.2018070103
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jban00:v:5:y:2018:i:3:p:33-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.