IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/javet0/v7y2016i3p71-81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emerging Action Research Traditions: Rigor in Practice

Author

Listed:
  • Karen E. Watkins

    (College of Education, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA)

  • Aliki Nicolaides

    (College of Education, The University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA)

  • Victoria J. Marsick

    (Teachers College, Columbia University, New York City, NY, USA)

Abstract

The authors argue here that contemporary use of action research shares the exploratory, inductive nature of many qualitative research approaches—no matter the type of data collected—because the type of research problems studied are set in complex, dynamic, rapidly changing contexts and because action research is undertaken to support social and organizational change that requires buy-in from many stakeholders affected by the research problem. Action research serves as a critique and alternative to more traditional views of social science. In this article, the authors first describe action research as defined by Kurt Lewin, its originator. They show how two variants of action research—Action Science and Collaborative Developmental Action Inquiry—advance insight into how action research can be used to develop personal capability to address system changes that action research seeks to unveil. By using the example of an innovative action research approach to doctoral research, the authors illustrate the context-rich, exploratory nature of action research that both generates knowledge for and in change, and developmentally engages collaborating researchers and participants. They conclude with reflections on criteria for rigor and relevance in action research in today's post-modern, complex world.

Suggested Citation

  • Karen E. Watkins & Aliki Nicolaides & Victoria J. Marsick, 2016. "Emerging Action Research Traditions: Rigor in Practice," International Journal of Adult Vocational Education and Technology (IJAVET), IGI Global, vol. 7(3), pages 71-81, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:javet0:v:7:y:2016:i:3:p:71-81
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJAVET.2016070107
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:javet0:v:7:y:2016:i:3:p:71-81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.