IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jamc00/v9y2018i1p78-94.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Algorithmic Performance by Frontier Analysis: A DEA Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Humberto Ablanedo-Rosas

    (University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, TX, USA)

  • Cesar Rego

    (University of Mississippi, Oxford, MS, USA)

Abstract

In Combinatorial Optimization the evaluation of heuristic algorithms often requires the consideration of multiple performance metrics that are relevant for the application of interest. Traditional empirical analysis of algorithms relies on evaluating individual performance metrics where the overall assessment is conducted by subjective judgment without the support of rigorous scientific methods. The authors propose an analytical approach based on data envelopment analysis (DEA) to rank algorithms by their relative efficiency scores that result from combining multiple performance metrics. To evaluate their approach, they perform a pilot study examining the relative performance of ten surrogate constraint algorithms for different classes of the set covering problem. The analysis shows their DEA-based approach is highly effective, establishing a clear difference between the algorithms' performances at appropriate statistical significance levels, and in consequence providing useful insights into the selection of algorithms to address each class of instances. Their approach is general and can be used with all types of performance metrics and algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Humberto Ablanedo-Rosas & Cesar Rego, 2018. "Assessing Algorithmic Performance by Frontier Analysis: A DEA Approach," International Journal of Applied Metaheuristic Computing (IJAMC), IGI Global, vol. 9(1), pages 78-94, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jamc00:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:78-94
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijamc.2018010106
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jamc00:v:9:y:2018:i:1:p:78-94. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.