IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jamc00/v5y2014i3p44-70.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Metaheuristics Stopping Criteria and Performances: Cases of NSGA-II and MOPSO-CD for Sustainable Peach Fruit Design

Author

Listed:
  • Mohamed-Mahmoud Ould Sidi

    (UR 1115 Plantes et Systèmes de Culture Horticoles, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Avignon, France)

  • Bénédicte Quilot-Turion

    (UR 1052 Génétique et Amélioration des Fruits et Légumes, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Montfavet, France)

  • Abdeslam Kadrani

    (Mathematics and Operation Research, Institut National de Statistique et Economie Appliquée (INSEA), Rabat, Morocco)

  • Michel Génard

    (UR 1115 Plantes et Systèmes de Culture Horticoles, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Avignon, France)

  • Françoise Lescourret

    (UR 1115 Plantes et Systèmes de Culture Horticoles, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Avignon, France)

Abstract

A major difficulty in the use of metaheuristics (i.e. evolutionary and particle swarm algorithms) to deal with multi-objective optimization problems is the choice of a convenient point at which to stop computation. Indeed, it is difficult to find the best compromise between the stopping criterion and the algorithm performance. This paper addresses this issue using the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) and the Multi-Objective Particle Swarm Optimization with Crowding Distance (MOPSO-CD) for the model-based design of sustainable peach fruits. The optimization problem of interest contains three objectives: maximize fruit fresh mass, maximize fruit sugar content, and minimize the crack density on the fruit skin. This last objective targets a reduction in the use of fungicides and can thus enhance preservation of the environment and human health. Two versions of the NSGA-II and two of the MOPSO-CD were applied to tackle this difficult optimization problem: the original versions with a maximum number of generations used as stopping criterion and modified versions using the stopping criterion proposed by the authors of (Roudenko & Schoenauer, 2004). This second stopping criterion is based on the stabilization of the maximal crowding distance and aims to stop computation when many generations are performed without further improvement in the quality of the solutions. A benchmark consisting of four plant management scenarios has been used to compare the performances of the original versions (OV) and the modified versions (MV) of the NSGA-II and the MOPSO-CD. Twelve independent simulations were performed for each version and for each scenario, and a high number of generations were generated for the OV (e.g., 1500 for the NSGA-II and 200 for the MOPSO-CD). This paper compares the performances of the two versions of both algorithms using four standard metrics and statistical tests. For both algorithms, the MV obtained solutions similar in quality to those of the OV but after significantly fewer generations. The resulting reduction in computational time for the optimization step will provide opportunities for further studies on the sustainability of peach ideotypes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohamed-Mahmoud Ould Sidi & Bénédicte Quilot-Turion & Abdeslam Kadrani & Michel Génard & Françoise Lescourret, 2014. "The Relationship between Metaheuristics Stopping Criteria and Performances: Cases of NSGA-II and MOPSO-CD for Sustainable Peach Fruit Design," International Journal of Applied Metaheuristic Computing (IJAMC), IGI Global, vol. 5(3), pages 44-70, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jamc00:v:5:y:2014:i:3:p:44-70
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijamc.2014070104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jamc00:v:5:y:2014:i:3:p:44-70. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.