IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jagr00/v6y2015i3p58-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alternative Methods for Developing and Assessing the Accuracy of UAV-Derived DEMs

Author

Listed:
  • Dion J. Wiseman

    (Department of Geography, Brandon University, Brandon, Canada)

  • Jurjen van der Sluijs

    (Department of Geography, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada)

Abstract

Digital terrain models are invaluable datasets that are frequently used for visualizing, modeling, and analyzing Earth surface processes. Accurate models covering local scale landscape features are often very expensive and have poor temporal resolution. This research investigates the utility of UAV acquired imagery for generating high resolution terrain models and provides a detailed accuracy assessment according to recommended protocols. High resolution UAV imagery was acquired over a localized dune complex in southwestern Manitoba, Canada and two alternative workflows were evaluated for extracting point clouds. UAV-derived data points were then compared to reference data sets acquired using mapping grade GPS receivers and a total station. Results indicated that the UAV imagery was capable of producing dense point clouds and high resolution terrain models with mean errors as low as -0.15 m and RMSE values of 0.42 m depending on the resolution of the image dataset and workflow employed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dion J. Wiseman & Jurjen van der Sluijs, 2015. "Alternative Methods for Developing and Assessing the Accuracy of UAV-Derived DEMs," International Journal of Applied Geospatial Research (IJAGR), IGI Global, vol. 6(3), pages 58-77, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jagr00:v:6:y:2015:i:3:p:58-77
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/ijagr.2015070104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jagr00:v:6:y:2015:i:3:p:58-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.