IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jaec00/v11y2020i1p52-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Evaluation of Assorted Risk Management Models and Frameworks in Software Development

Author

Listed:
  • Alankrita Aggarwal

    (IKG Punjab Technical University, Jallandhar Punjab, India)

  • Kanwalvir Singh Dhindsa

    (Baba Banda Singh Bahadur Engineering College, Fatehgarh Sahib Punjab, India)

  • P. K. Suri

    (Kurukshetra University, Kurukshetra, India)

Abstract

Software risk management is one the key factors in software project management with the goal to improve quality as avoid vulnerabilities. The term defect refers to an imperfection that may arise because of reasons including programmers' skills, lack of suitable testing strategies, and many others. When actual results are different from expected result or meeting wrong requirement, it is called defect and it forms the basis of risk escalation in a software project which is obviously not accepted in any type of deployment. Making a reliable software should be risk free from any vulnerability. Along with reliability another issue arises is software quality which is a factor with software risk management. The quality of software is to reduce the occurrence of risks and defects with the objective to produce an effectual value software which is key point of consideration. In this article, is underlined the present assorted risk management strategies proposed and projected by a number of researchers and academicians on the different parameters using benchmark datasets from renowned sources of research.

Suggested Citation

  • Alankrita Aggarwal & Kanwalvir Singh Dhindsa & P. K. Suri, 2020. "An Empirical Evaluation of Assorted Risk Management Models and Frameworks in Software Development," International Journal of Applied Evolutionary Computation (IJAEC), IGI Global, vol. 11(1), pages 52-62, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jaec00:v:11:y:2020:i:1:p:52-62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJAEC.2020010104
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jaec00:v:11:y:2020:i:1:p:52-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.