IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jaci00/v1y2009i2p59-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Issues for the Evaluation of Ambient Displays

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaobin Shen

    (University of Melbourne, Australia)

  • Andrew Vande Moere

    (University of Sydney, Australia)

  • Peter Eades

    (University of Sydney, Australia)

  • Seok-Hee Hong

    (University of Sydney, Australia)

Abstract

This article is motivated by two evaluation case studies of ambient information displays. Firstly, an intrusive evaluation of a display called MoneyColor concentrates on the relationship between “distraction” and “comprehension”. This revealed that the comprehension is in direct proportion to display-distraction, but there is no clear relationship between comprehension and self-interruption. Secondly, a non-intrusive evaluation of a display called Fisherman described a quantitative measurement of user “interest” and applied this measurement to investigate “evaluation time” issue. These experiments give some insight into number of issues in evaluation of ambient displays.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaobin Shen & Andrew Vande Moere & Peter Eades & Seok-Hee Hong, 2009. "Issues for the Evaluation of Ambient Displays," International Journal of Ambient Computing and Intelligence (IJACI), IGI Global, vol. 1(2), pages 59-69, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:igg:jaci00:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:59-69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/jaci.2009040108
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jaci00:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:59-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.